F A C U L T Y   &   S T A F F

USC | LAW

News & Events

Law firm model is broken, expert says

Recession speeding up changes that were inevitable, according to Bruce MacEwen o... /more

Woman freed by student speaks to law school

Connie Keel was released on parole in April after serving 29 years in prison /more

Current and Future Challenges in Copyright Law

Entertainment insiders, USC Law profs examine the collision of technology and ar... /more

USC | Gould School of Law

CruzLines

A legal blog offering excursions into the Constitution, equality law, sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation.

Portugal's Marriage Exclusion Upheld

"Something good could happen/Something good could have happened"

31 July 2009

In a closely divided decision, the Constitutional Court of Portugal voted 3 to 2 to uphold that country's restriction of marriage to male-female couples against a challenge based on a provision in the Portuguese Constitution forbidding sexual orientation discrimination, reports the Associated Press.  I believe this is the statement from the Court's web site (but I do not read Portuguese).  Unless the Court reverses course some time in the future or the European Court of Human rights accepts and agrees with the appeal of the lesbian couple denied a marriage license, marriage equality there will have to await the approval of Portugal's Parliament, which does not appear to be an imminent prospect.

Posted by Cruz at 5:04 PM | Link | 0 comments

Categories: sexual orientation discrimination marriage Portugal

Delhi High Court Curtails Sodomy Law

"Times are changing for the better"

02 July 2009

Today the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi sharply limited Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.  Section 377, which prohibits "carnal intercourse" and has come to be known as the "unnatural offences" section, was facially neutral but in practice targeted LGBT persons.  The Court held it unconstitutional insofar as it criminalized consensual sex acts between adults in private.  In closing, the Court wrote:

     "If there is one constitutional tenet that can be said to be
underlying theme of the Indian Constitution, it is that of
'inclusiveness'. This Court believes that Indian Constitution
reflects this value deeply ingrained in Indian society,
nurtured over several generations. The inclusiveness that
Indian society traditionally displayed, literally in every
aspect of life, is manifest in recognising a role in society for
everyone.  Those perceived by the majority as “deviants' or
'different' are not on that score excluded or ostracised.
     "Where society can display inclusiveness and understanding,
such persons can be assured of a life of dignity and non-
discrimination. ...   In our view, Indian
Constitutional law does not permit the statutory criminal law
to be held captive by the popular misconceptions of who the
LGBTs are.  It cannot be forgotten that discrimination is anti-
thesis of equality and that it is the recognition of equality
which will foster the dignity of every individual."

Posted by Cruz at 7:06 AM | Link | 0 comments

Categories: sodomy India human rights respect for private life sexual orientation gender identity LGBTI rights

David Cruz

Professor David Cruz is a constitutional law expert focusing on civil rights and equality issues, including equal marriage rights for same-sex couples.

Previous Month Next Month July, 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Facebook
Add to Technorati Favorites