F A C U L T Y   &   S T A F F

USC | LAW

News & Events

High school students learn how to get ahead at Street Law program

Annual Mentor Day highlights higher education /more

USC Law Hosts Conference on Empirical Legal Studies

Law students, faculty encouraged to attend Friday and Saturday conference /more

Law firm model is broken, expert says

Recession speeding up changes that were inevitable, according to Bruce MacEwen o... /more

USC | Gould School of Law

CruzLines

A legal blog offering excursions into the Constitution, equality law, sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation.

I'm Getting Married in the Morning

15 May 2008

The California Supreme Court has just held, 4-3, that the state constitution requires the government to allow same-sex couples to marry civilly.  Chief Justice George wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Kennard, Werdegar, and Moreno.  The court held that the least deferential form of review applied -- "strict scrutiny" -- because the exclusion of same-sex couples from civil marriage discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation and because it "impinges upon a same-sex couple’s fundamental interest in having their family relationship accorded the same respect and dignity enjoyed by an opposite-sex couple." More details soon.

Now, it might not actually be in the morning.  Under Rule of Court 8.528(b), the decision will become final in 30 days unless the court orders otherwise.  Notably, today's decision does not follow Vermont's or Massachusett's lead in offering legislators 6 months to fix the constitutional problem.  In part, that seems unneeded because those states lacked the fairly comprehensive domestic partnership regime California enjoys.  What the court instead said was that "Plaintiffs are entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandate directing the appropriate state officials to take all actions necessary to effectuate our ruling in this case so as to ensure that county clerks and other local officials throughout the state, in performing their duty to enforce the marriage statutes in their jurisdictions, apply those provisions in a manner consistent with the decision of this court."  Nothing should keep a county (say, San Francisco) that wanted to from complying with the judgment before 30 days have run.

Posted by Cruz at 10:05 AM | Link | 0 comments

Categories: marriage California Supreme Court

David Cruz

Professor David Cruz is a constitutional law expert focusing on civil rights and equality issues, including equal marriage rights for same-sex couples.

Previous Month Next Month May, 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Facebook
Add to Technorati Favorites