<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF 
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>
		
	<channel rdf:about="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz">
	<title>CruzLines</title>
	<description>Powered by USC Law</description>
	<link>http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz</link>
	
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq>
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2009/03/ProMarriage-Equality-Initiative-Filed.cfm" />
			
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	
	</channel>
		
  	<item rdf:about="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2009/03/ProMarriage-Equality-Initiative-Filed.cfm">
	<title>Pro-Marriage Equality Initiative Filed</title>
	<description>Yesterday, March 19, 2009, the California Secretary of State provided an &lt;a href=&quot;javascript:void(0);/*1237613918614*/&quot;&gt;official summary&lt;/a&gt; for a proposed initiative (the &lt;a href=&quot;javascript:void(0);/*1237613989952*/&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;California Marriage Equality Act&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;) to re-amend the state constitution to restore same-sex couples&apos; equal right to marry.&amp;nbsp; Proponents will now have until August 19 to gather the not quite 700,000 signature required to qualify it to go before the voters.&amp;nbsp; Besides repealing the section of the California Constitution added by Proposition 8, the measure specifies -- apparently to forestall some of the chief fear tactics used in the Yes on 8 campaign -- that it shall not be interpreted to change school curricula or force clergy to perform services or duties &amp;quot;incongruent with their faith.&amp;quot;</description>
	<link>http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2009/03/ProMarriage-Equality-Initiative-Filed.cfm</link>
	<dc:date>2009-03-20T22:43:19-08:00</dc:date>
	
	<dc:subject>California Constitution, California Marriage Equality Act,Prop 8,marriage</dc:subject>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF> 