<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF 
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>
		
	<channel rdf:about="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz">
	<title>CruzLines</title>
	<description>Powered by USC Law</description>
	<link>http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz</link>
	
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq>
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2008/10/Supreme-Court-Reaffirms-Ban-on-Death-Penalty-for-Child-Rape.cfm" />
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2008/06/Death-Penalty-for-Raping-Child-Unconstitutional.cfm" />
			
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	
	</channel>
		
  	<item rdf:about="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2008/10/Supreme-Court-Reaffirms-Ban-on-Death-Penalty-for-Child-Rape.cfm">
	<title>Supreme Court Reaffirms Ban on Death Penalty for Child Rape</title>
	<description>Today the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a petition for rehearing in &lt;em&gt;Kennedy v. Louisiana&lt;/em&gt; (blogged &lt;a href=&quot;http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2008/06/Death-Penalty-for-Raping-Child-Unconstitutional.cfm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), its decision from June 2008 holding that the death penalty for raping a child is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment&apos;s ban on cruel and unusual punishments.&amp;nbsp; Reserving the question whether unique considerations might allow the military to impose punishments that would be unconstitutional in the civilian context, the majority&apos;s Statement respecting the denial of rehearing reiterated the Court&apos;s emphasis on the non-military criminal rape laws of the states and the federal government as reflecting a consensus on the impermissibility of executing someone for a crime (such as raping a child) not resulting in death.</description>
	<link>http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2008/10/Supreme-Court-Reaffirms-Ban-on-Death-Penalty-for-Child-Rape.cfm</link>
	<dc:date>2008-10-01T08:40:00-08:00</dc:date>
	
	<dc:subject>U.S. Supreme Court,Eighth Amendment,rape</dc:subject>
	</item>
	
  	<item rdf:about="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2008/06/Death-Penalty-for-Raping-Child-Unconstitutional.cfm">
	<title>Death Penalty for Raping Child Unconstitutional</title>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States has held in &lt;em&gt;Kennedy v. Louisiana&lt;/em&gt;, by a 5-4 vote, that the state violated the Eighth Amendment&apos;s ban on cruel and unusual punishments by prescribing the death penalty for rape of a child under the age of 12, where the perpetrator did not kill the child and did not intend to kill the child.&amp;nbsp; Justice Kennedy (no relation to the convicted) wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Stevens, Souter, Breyer, and Ginsburg.&amp;nbsp; Justice Alito dissented, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia and Thomas.&amp;nbsp; Despite the recognized brutality of the crime against the child victim, Justice Kennedy&apos;s opinion for the Court insisted on the Constitution&apos;s commitment to respecting the dignity of all individuals.&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;As it related to crimes against individuals,&amp;quot; he wrote, &amp;quot;the death penalty should not be expanded to instances where the victim&apos;s life was not taken.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; (Note though the interesting conflict between the Court&apos;s framing of its principles -- is the death penalty unconstitutional whenever &amp;quot;life [i]s not taken,&amp;quot; or could it be imposed if the perpetrator intended to take life even if the crime did not result in the victim&apos;s death?&amp;nbsp; This could become a point of future litigation about the reach of the Eighth Amendment.)</description>
	<link>http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2008/06/Death-Penalty-for-Raping-Child-Unconstitutional.cfm</link>
	<dc:date>2008-06-25T08:17:00-08:00</dc:date>
	
	<dc:subject>U.S. Supreme Court,Eighth Amendment,rape,U.S. Supreme Court,Eighth Amendment,rape</dc:subject>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF> 