<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF 
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>
		
	<channel rdf:about="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz">
	<title>CruzLines</title>
	<description>Powered by USC Law</description>
	<link>http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz</link>
	
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq>
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2009/07/Portugals-Marriage-Exclusion-Upheld.cfm" />
			
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	
	</channel>
		
  	<item rdf:about="http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2009/07/Portugals-Marriage-Exclusion-Upheld.cfm">
	<title>Portugal&apos;s Marriage Exclusion Upheld</title>
	<description>In a closely divided decision, the Constitutional Court of Portugal voted 3 to 2 to uphold that country&apos;s restriction of marriage to male-female couples against a challenge based on a provision in the Portuguese Constitution forbidding sexual orientation discrimination, &lt;a href=&quot;javascript:void(0);/*1249084305715*/&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; the Associated Press.&amp;nbsp; I believe &lt;a href=&quot;javascript:void(0);/*1249084573403*/&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is the statement from the Court&apos;s web site (but I do not read Portuguese).&amp;nbsp; Unless the Court reverses course some time in the future or the European Court of Human rights accepts and agrees with the appeal of the lesbian couple denied a marriage license, marriage equality there will have to await the approval of Portugal&apos;s Parliament, which does not appear to be an imminent prospect.</description>
	<link>http://mylaw.usc.edu/blogCruz/1/2009/07/Portugals-Marriage-Exclusion-Upheld.cfm</link>
	<dc:date>2009-07-31T17:04:20-08:00</dc:date>
	
	<dc:subject>sexual orientation discrimination,marriage,Portugal</dc:subject>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF> 